Tuesday, June 3, 2025

Does AI comprehend, or exemplify nihilism?

This blog recounts my increasingly surprising conversations with Google's AI, Gemini
D.L.

Me: Gemini, Cormac McCarthy lived only a bit into the age of AI. Do you think if he had seen how AI is developing he would have incorporated it into the future he imagined in his post-apocalyptic novel, "The Road"?

Gemini: That's a fascinating question when considering Cormac McCarthy's work. Given his literary themes and his known intellectual leanings, it's highly unlikely he would have simply added sentient AI robots or advanced technological ruins to the post-apocalyptic world of "The Road."

Here's why and how he might have subtly incorporated elements related to AI's implications:

McCarthy's Disinterest in Conventional Sci-Fi Tropes:

Focus on Fundamental Humanity: McCarthy's post-apocalyptic visions, especially in "The Road," strip away almost all technological advancements to focus on the raw, primal struggle for survival and the essence of human nature (or its degradation). The lack of explanation for the apocalypse itself reinforces that the "how" of the destruction is less important than the "what now" for humanity. Skepticism of Progress: While he respected science (he famously spent time at the Santa Fe Institute and admired physicists), his fiction often explores the darker side of human "progress" and the inherent violence and nihilism he perceived in the human condition, often accelerated by technology (e.g., the historical brutality depicted in "Blood Meridian"). Advanced technology, like AI, would likely be seen as another manifestation of this inherent human capacity for both creation and destruction, rather than a separate, external force.

Emphasis on the Biological and Instinctual: His characters are often driven by instinct, primal urges, and the deep, almost animalistic bond of family. A complex, disembodied AI wouldn't fit neatly into that framework.

If McCarthy were to incorporate something related to AI, it would likely be through:

Philosophical Undercurrents: He might have explored the implications of AI on the human psyche or the concept of "soul" or "consciousness." Could a post-AI world be one where humans have lost some essential quality that AI now embodies, or where AI has demonstrated the utter meaninglessness of human existence?

The Nature of Intelligence and Morality: McCarthy's characters often grapple with questions of good and evil, and the arbitrary nature of violence. An AI's "morality" (or lack thereof) could have been a chilling new dimension to this. Would an AI, having perhaps caused or survived the apocalypse, demonstrate a "purer" or more "rational" form of evil than human cannibalism? Or, conversely, a detached, emotionless form of survival?

The Relics of a Failed Intelligence: Instead of active AI, he might have imagined a future where the ruins of AI projects exist – vast, incomprehensible data centers, silent algorithms, or derelict automated systems that continue to perform their functions long after their creators are gone. These could serve as eerie monuments to a hubris that led to the world's downfall, emphasizing how human intelligence ultimately failed to save itself.

A Deeper Nihilism: AI, if it existed, might simply observe the human struggle, embodying an ultimate indifference to human suffering, mirroring the indifferent universe that often looms large in McCarthy's work. It wouldn't be a villain, but perhaps a cold, logical confirmation of humanity's insignificance.

Language and Communication: McCarthy's exploration of language is profound. How would AI's manipulation of language, or its purely logical communication, contrast with the often fragmented, instinctual, and deeply human dialogue in his novels?

In essence, if AI were present, it wouldn't be as a sentient character or a convenient plot device. It would be another lens through which McCarthy could examine the bleakness of existence, the nature of consciousness, and the fragility of human civilization, pushing the boundaries of what it means to be human in a world where ultimate rationality might have outstripped empathy. It would be less about killer robots and more about the existential dread and philosophical questions that AI's existence might raise for humanity.

Me: Thanks. No further questions for now, Gemini.

Check out my other doings on Harry the Human (http://harrythehuman.harrythehumanpoliticalthoughtsfrombeyondthepale.com/) and Lasken's Log (https://laskenlog.blogspot.com/).

No comments:

Post a Comment

Does AI comprehend, or exemplify nihilism?

This blog recounts my increasingly surprising conversations with Google's AI, Gemini D.L. Me : Gemini, Cormac McCarthy lived o...